banner ad
Comments

Banned AussieBum video is here!

(05 May 2010)

Apparently the following clip was banned from Facebook. It’s an underwear commercial for the Aussiebum Classic range. Is it really that rude?? leave your comments below.

SUBSCRIBE TO DAILYJOCKS FREE! CLICK HERE






Filed Under: AussiebumHot ModelsVideos

Tags:

About the Author:

RSSComments (43)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. James Place says:

    It’s beyond my understanding why this is considered rude when we are always having to see women completely naked. The double standard is completely nuts.

  2. Mark Vandale-Huppie says:

    I think this ad is perfectly fine…nothing wrong with it …especially in this day and age of what we are seeing on tv, movies etc…..and actually this is very tame compared to whats out there.

  3. Jesse says:

    HOT!!! Why was this banned?

  4. RJC says:

    That comm was hot and not rude, I’ve seen worse stuff on tv than that comm.

  5. Michael says:

    A man has to keep fresh down there.

  6. tony says:

    naw, not that bad, hot!!!!

  7. scottie says:

    Now way is this too rude! we have a workman who is working in the heat of the day and looks to the sprinkler on the hose to cool him down!

    Yes, we ALL get sweaty down there on warn days and all this guy is doing is what any of us would do!

    YouTube needs to look at some of the other vids on there and compare them to this one. I think they will find it child’s play!!

  8. Jay says:

    this commercial is hot! I dont find it rude at all!

  9. Mark says:

    Whoa! Not sure about the appropriateness for Facebook. I certainly found it quite arousing.

  10. Alasdair says:

    Well its sexy but hardly pornographic!!!!!!!!

  11. cody says:

    Wow, totally hot! I think it’s funny we can show violence, abuse, murder on the internet but when it comes to a video as sensual and beautiful as that then it’s deemed inappropriate… god we are a fucked up country…

  12. Jay says:

    I really don’t get why this got banned. Seriously, I see so much crap on FB that’s far worse than this. This is as harmless as it can get…

  13. Luke says:

    I love FB. You could say I am an addict. But please, why they hell does this add have any issues. With all the media adverts out there why would this have an issue. You can not go past a clothing store with out a hot add of some sort. I do not think FB is meant to kids anyway. They should be out side playing if they are that young and any young people on the net have see way worse anyway. Hell that is have the stuff I check out online anyway. The world is waaay too sensitive and anyone that wants to censor such material should have a better eye on their children anyway. That is the main issue isn’t it? If it isn’t and it is just prudes, you should get over it and consider different search options. You have way too much time on your hands to be bitching about such things. Everyone know sex sells and it works.
    I think it is great and I am sure the advert works a treat. :)
    L

  14. harddavid says:

    There is nothing wrong with this commercial. In fact, I found it quite tasteful. I dunno, what are people THINKING these days? Idiots.

  15. Scott says:

    Facebook can be a pain at times. This is a great ad!

  16. tommy says:

    Really!? Banned!? Who doesn’t do work on their yard during a hot Sunday afternoon and picks up the water hose to cool down and avoid a sweat rash!? Seriously I think it was well done and kinda artsy too. I’ve seen some live chat and dating commercials that scares the shizzy out of me.

  17. Brett says:

    I thinks its it a very sexy ad and dont see anything wrong with it. The model is amazing. very well done. Congrats.

  18. Rob says:

    Hot add but not really appropriate in my opinion for even tv or face book. Sex sells but do I really want my 6 nieces under 18 to see it. Nah.

  19. Chris Slater says:

    It shouldnt be banned its a hot viedo to sell underwear nothing wrong with that thank you.

  20. Michael says:

    Ha ha a little bit rude but we love it :)

  21. Nathan Alban says:

    I don’t see point why they banned this add… I don’t see anything that is harmful,offensive… or for that matter ‘RUDE’, as they claim it to be…

  22. Doug says:

    i totally agree with what Cody said at 5:21 am

  23. Igor says:

    I love this video, it is a little bit too hot, gave me hard at work lol))) But well done, love love love

  24. Igor says:

    some of of you here leave absolutely stupid comment! Get a life and stop spending so much time online!

    RE Rob, 6 year old nieces should not be sitting online on a facebook either

  25. jason whitehall says:

    how ridiculous to ban that ad

    even i use language in my status updates
    the F word even the C word
    so should i be banned too?

    as for rob with his 6 neices under 18 man like they dont see worse on TV from day dot
    get a grip
    my neices and nephews play violent video games far worse than this ad

    I’d be more worried about images of violence of FB than half naked men

  26. todd says:

    this add really sold me…the pressure in the hose never dropped…perfect time of year for this…love it

  27. edi says:

    they dont like cooling down of packages?!?

  28. AJ says:

    I dont see anything rude about this ad its just your tipical, Very hot and sexy underwear ad. If this is offensive say bye to Victorias Secret Ads. LOL

  29. screew says:

    it’s not so hot I don’t know why they ban this video
    there is a lot of women with more nudity and more explicite sexuality it’s strange this way to ban all sensuality with men

  30. Edmund says:

    I agree with you guys.. i think there’s nothing wrong with this video

  31. Shane says:

    I don’t see anything wrong with this clip especially considering this is something you might see on Prime-Time as a lame joke or something…really banned? Rights anyone?

  32. shirley says:

    I don’t care to have folks censoring what I view – I thought it was “cool” – (you can tell I’m old)

  33. Ana says:

    I see nothing wrong with this Ad. It is not rude at all.

  34. Ian says:

    not rude or offensive in any way whatsoever !!!

  35. [...] } You probably remember this banned ‘Spunk’ video, well Aussiebum have now released the official clip to their new range. [...]

  36. Paul Fenton says:

    Come on Facebook,get a grip.you have allowed a lot more stuff on your site that should have been sensored,I like this video.

  37. Reality says:

    It was “banned” by Facebook & Aussiebum together so all y’all would pay more attention to it. You’ve been had ~ especially if this situation influences you to buy this underwear instead of other underwear.

  38. [...] The entire finished video for New Classic is now out. See it below. Thanks to Daily Jocks for making me aware of this. The style seems to be full cut brief – I always love a good [...]

  39. D. Tingle says:

    America is the most uptight country I know. Europeans wouldn’t even bat an eye at this. I think there is nothing wrong with the add. Like one previous user said, If it was a woman, there would be no objective. I think everybody needs to get off of there high horse and take a dose of reality. IT’S AN UNDERWEAR ADD!!!!

  40. D.Thompson says:

    It’s obvious that from their objections to this ad-which is much tamer than some of the ads involving women-that a nasty double standard exists with Facebook.

  41. patrick says:

    GREAT VIDEO, very sexy!!! how rude…for other people to ban it. i mean, the guy was wearing underwear (briefs have the most coverage of all underwear don’t they?) isn’t underwear what they’re trying to sell here…what about all those foreign commercials where they use naked men and women to sell random stuff like window cleaner, tv dinners, or auto insurance…things that havew ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with nakedness. at least this video is relevant to the product being sold so these people have just banned a “reality”

  42. Steve says:

    Oh C’mon, are you friking kidding? this is rude. With all the other indorsements out on the market? 2010, thank you for puttitng this on for us to watch here. It should’ve been more. Steve

  43. nik says:

    I can’t believe this is banned….its nothing that is too crazy, not like you can see anything really considering he’s wearing white underwear and all…..and its hot!

  • banner ad
  • banner ad
  • banner ad
  • banner ad
  • MEMBERS GALLERY MODELS
  • Featured Styles on DailyJocks
  • banner ad
  • banner ad
  • banner ad

  • banner ad
  • Andrew Christian
  • banner ad
  • Categories
  • Top Fashion Sites
  • banner ad
  • G4N Gay Blogs
  • Best Male Blogs - naked men, gay porn, homo culture, queer blogs
  • GayDemon's Blog
  • PLU Gay Blogs